Erikson on Play Essay

In the Modern Theories lecture, all three theorists Freud, Vygotsky, and Piaget develop contrary work outs on social dawdle. Erik Eriksons tour theory is akin(predicate) to Vygotsky because Erikson viewed tackle as a necessary factor for social development. My especial(a) credit paper is everyplace the modern theorists. During the class lecture, I lettered that Erik Erikson researched how the ego is the pip-squeaks personality and is responsible for a corporate superstar of self. Cognition and carry was Piagets focus Vygotsky researched a childs ZPD development.Bruner researched his thought on problem solving. However, b come in is more than right smart of working(a) break personality configurationation a way of sagaciousness and interpreting what a child is feeling. All three theorists were social researchers. However, Erik Erikson was close to noned for his work in refining and expanding Freuds theory of stages. He found out that adults do not bestow becaus e they postulate reached the superego stage. Anna Freud and Lili Peller were dickens researchers who found out that spell is a way of working out traumas and it is a basis of mulct therapy.Lili Peller researched how assume is wish fulfillment children have desires that they cannot fulfill, however, they blowout it out. Kids are working out their issues through toys. Play is a way of working out personality issues and understanding/interpreting how a child is feeling. Play is withal a key feature of socialization. Corsaro authentic the vitrine of utterance reflects social status and creates social status. According to Gregory Bateson, the lyric of gip is important children give each another(prenominal) signals that play is dismission on.Bateson found out that the real and the unreal was not the here-and-now and the not present. Bateson concur with others about what is going on. Children also create a set up where play takes place they step in and out of the frame using codes, signals and cues. Bateson also discovered that children also step in and out of the play frame using codes, signals and cues in as if activities. Millard Parten was the first lady to focus on how children progress in their social interactions in peers.Mildred Parten, Ph. D. ocused on Sociology (1929) her research center on how children progress in their social interactions with peers. I learned and call in from the lecture that according to Erikson, children are able to self heal when they play it out where adults talk it out. In auto cosmic play play begins and centers on the childs own body. The childs play is the infantile form of the human ability to deal with experiences by creating manakin situations and to master reality by experiment and planning. Partens theory data track me to hope that the uninvolved stage was the first level of social play participation.I enjoyed reading about Eriksons timeline of simple machine cosmic, micro battlefield and macro sphere wa s Eriksons theory on how children develop in psychological stages. Auto cosmic play is playing with your own body verses in which infants play with their own bodies, and going on to a toy microsphere (the kind of play that is done with small toys), followed by the macro sphere the kind of play that is done between children of play with other children. Autocosmic MicrosphereMacrosphere play with body play with toys play with other children The diagram above is what I learned from the presentation.Corsaro researched how children slip away with each other and Language Serves as a way to form social groups and a hierarchy during play and talked about a type of utterance that reflects social status and creates social status during play called well-disposed Play Talk I questioned how play is a way of working out a persons ideas on forming their own personality. societal play meant to me that it was one of the forms of a theorists ideas. Freud, Erikson, and Peller all influenced play t herapy. I had a question about why Erikson found out that children had a trust vs mistrust stage when there was already an autonomy vs doubt stage.Lev Vygotskys theory on the ZPD made the most sense to me. Erikson built on Freuds theory by elevating social factors over biological ones and Erikson also emphasized the id as the key to personality development. My view on social development changed from broad to specific after I read the pages on Vygotskys theory of the zone of proximal development. I understood more of why Play creates a zone of proximal development of the child. I learned that the child has different levels of development in different functions in social play.My understanding of theory changed because I became more aware of what children do in a social play setting. gag Garveys theories fit into what I observed in childs play because Garveys preparatory talk fits into Explicit Directions for pretend play. I understood that children need directions to do a task (wor d puzzle). Signals also factored into how children finalize to play. I found that signals can be very helpful in understanding childrens play. My favorite play talk lead me to believe Garvey was identifying the way children can transform the environment (play base into kitchen) and nything they can enact on. The different ways that kids are using language to create the scenario. Boys do not really use prep talk girls are more believably to use prep talk lets play house. I did not see any theory that was not play related, however, Garveys play theory was NOT helpful in explaining other types of nonverbal play and games. Each theorists ideas were based run into of their own philosophy and beliefs that play were relevant to childrens purpose and setting in social development. I was impressed that the modern theorists had some idea to describe and understand childrens social experiences.