Adults in Rebound Relationships: A Narrative Inquiry

Adults in Rebound Relationships A Narrative InquiryAdrienne Maie C. BactolSushmita G. De LeonKyle Marie S. CayabanMa. Fatima G. IsananEverybody has heard of trammel fling. This type of race comes immediately after ending the forward human alliance. Rebounds argon usually not based on love, rather it is just a port for plurality to relieve themselves from the l iodineliness and hurt they felt from their break-up. They argon dubbed as recant race which reflects a park perception that they ar whatsoeverhow unique or different from a non-rebound family.According to Brumbaugh and Fraley (2014), A rebound birth is commonly understood to be a race that is initiated shortly after the end of a significant romantic affinitybefore the feelings nigh the mildewer family relationship flip been fully resolved. The instruction re stick ins a commonly held negative view of rebounds. In sum, the consensus is that a rebound relationship is a band-aid that allowing head off us fr om dealing with overt randy issues bear upond to our previous relationship. A band-aid that can only roost in place temporarily and when ended, it still reveals an unhealed wound.People who latterly experienced a judicial separation whitethorn gain from engaging by dint of their emotional distress particularly by means of reflection and determineing a new relationship (Marshall, Bejanyan, Ferenczi, 2013). People rely on the re precedeations of their former assistants in finding a new render to guide the way they relate to others (BrumbaughFraley, 2006). However, according to Spielmann, MacDonald and Tackett (2011), ex- assistant in crimes perceived as having high potential for meaningful connectedness be especially unenviable to get over when current or future partners fall short in satisfying ineluctably for occasion and c resortness. But, focusing on a new relationship options either a new partner or an upbeat outlook on relationships decreases adhesiveness to an ex-partner for anxiously attached individualists (Spielmann, MacDonald, Wilson, 2009). On the other hand, according to Spielmann, Joel, MacDonald and Kogan (2012) ex-partners whitethorn be used in a substitution process to streng whence belongingness lacks when new relationship gets sour.One reasonable way that may assist the process of letting go is to enter into a new relationship (Spielmann et al., 2009). But it does not necessarily mean that the benefits rund by this path in getting over the previous partner outweigh the cost. To this point, in that location is secondary empirical evidence of strong costs to rebound relationships. Indeed, Wolfinger (2007) argues that disjoint and clock clock-to-remarriage statistics provide no supportive evidence for rebound-related problems. Conversely, Brumbaugh and Fraley (2014) made an empirical enquiry about rebound relationships, their research suggests that finding a new partner is salutary comp bed to those people who re primary(prenominal) single after the relationship has ended, and people who waited long-life to start their subsequent relationship has lesser welf be than people who catch their relationship quickly who too had better view of themselves. They overly nominate out that, people who begin their relationship immediately powerfulness arrange some resemblance between their previous partner and new partner. Lastly, whizz reason that people enter into a rebound relationship is to piddle away vengeance to their previous partner and to vent their fury.Relationship TerminationIt is of the essence(p) to acknowledge and understand about rebound relationships from which it has develop. Relationship boundary was associated with amplifications in psychological distress as well decreases in the way that individuals place their satisfaction with life which represents a significant stressor (Rhoades, Kamp Dush, Atkins, Stanley, Markman, 2011). In addition, Marshall et al. represent that people who had painful breakups may allow other people to adopt and be resilient, cleverer, and may be possessed of higher processing of cultivating themselves as an individual. They also established that different attachwork forcet styles of mortal can contribute to ontogenesis of the person after the relationship has terminated.They concluded that a person who has a broken heart and suffered the most has the possibility to encourage themselves to affirm an optimistic transformation. On the other hand, it appears that avoidant individuals appear to feel they have less to lose in highly intimate relationships, and as a result depend less pain when the relationship ends (Spielmann, Maxwell, MacDonald,Baratta, 2012).Relationship termination states that it is commonly dismay even for the person who initiated to end the relationship (Rhoades et al., 2011). It is typical to go through and through with(predicate) a period of grieving after terminating the romantic relationship. D uring this period, people may experience sadness, anger, and sometimes even challenging anxiety (Chung et al., 2003). People also often experience pro put together loneliness after losing a partner (Moller, Fouladi, McCarthy, Hatch, 2003). Certainly, serious consequences may arise if the relationship termination was a divorce such as custody arguments andmonetaryneeds(Wickrama, Lorenz, Conger, Elder, Abraham, Fang, 2006).With these, other than the immediate effects of a relationship loss, the loss of a partner can have a broad impact on life despite the fact that the bulk of the conclusions connected with breakups be hateful but some could be positive.In addition, relationship termination, specifically whenunanticipated, is known to hitthe vox populi toward oneself and self-respect. Amongst the best methods for repairing this, is to prove that the person is congruous and equipped for effectively getting new partner (Campbell, Trapnell, Heine, Katz,Lavallee, Lehman, 1996).In f act, Tashiro and Frazier (2003) states that individualimprovement is common interest breakups. later on you give your previous partner, it may allow you to increase a new feeling of autonomy or change undesirable behaviors and ways of thinking. Research shows individuals who argon intimate relationship have overturn dynamic social lives than single individuals (GerstelSarkisian, 2006). In sum, if the past partner was a poor match or had an unfavorable effect on ones intellectual well-being, the individual may be much satisfied and adjusted without the partner in his or her life.Rebound Relationships and Coping MechanismsCoping mechanisms are utilise by individuals in attempts to resolve difficulties or manage their internal or external demands that are challenging to their psychological resources (Bouchard Theriault, 2003). In addition, Choo, Hatfield and Levine (1996) state that men tend to use emotional distraction or dampening techniques following breakups, involving such things as burying themselves in work or sports to bury or ignore the pain resulting from the recent breakup. Therefore, men leave leaven to avoid the negative thoughts or emotions that are correlated with therelationship termination by focusing their direction elsewhere, which suggests the possibility that mencould also easily distract themselves by means of another relationship. Also, men have a object to be more defenseless, stunned, or disappointed when social terminations happen. They have been found to handle the closure of a sentimental relationship more difficult than women, and also been found to have stronger emotions of pity and depression (Demaray, Malecki, Rueger, 2008). Men are mostly engage in direct outcaste behaviors such as showing up at their ex-partners home. Women, on the other hand, are most likely to engage in less direct unwanted behaviors such as leaving phone messages (Haugaard Seri, 2003). According to Shimek and Bello (as cited in Hill, Rubin Peplau , 1976), women are most likely to initiate the breakup than men do. It could be fictitious that women have experienced less emotional violence and distractions. Women get to be aware of social issues sooner than men do, which permits them to plan for the certain and leave men unexpected revelation. Women tend to start stalking and consistently striving to restart the relationship by their ex-partners as more unreasonable than male. This then introduces theidea that men could be more likely than women to enter into rebound-type relationships after relationshiptermination as a way to redirect themselves away from the negative emotions associated with the recent break-up.However, one longitudinal investigation of undergraduate students examining the forecasting error found that the participants who had undone a two-month romantic relationship, majority part of them inform enhance successfulness after ten weeks. These changes were more unusual in people who reported being really inf atuated with their partners or who had a hard time in pursuing dating another person (Eastwick, Finkel, Krishnamurti, Loewenstein, 2008). In fact, researchers have discovered variety of indicators for emotional recovery after a breakup which assimilate affection for the previous partner, as well as duration of the past relationship, attachment style and situational factors, such as proceeded contact with the ex-partner. They have not given a specific and prudent time parcelling to serve everyone (Locker, McIntosh, Hackney, Wilson, Wiegand, 2010). Locker and colleagues (2010) also found that the shorter length of past relationship and quickness of returning back to a relationship were identified with enhanced social adjustment when assessed alongside with a variety of situational factors including social support. In other words, rapidly engaging in another relationship is more powerful in elevating a return to positive adjustment and relational recovery than more customarily acknowl edged systems such investing time with family or companions. In addition, engagement in a new relationship also seems to allow the individual to prevent depressive states often associated with social projection (Allen Badcock, 2003).Potential Functions of Rebound RelationshipThe period after a separation powerfulness be challenging for some individuals. Entering into another relationship may serve to help with some of these difficulties. One possibility is that individuals may utilize rebound relationships as an adapting coping strategy or asintend to distract themselves from painful emotions. Another possibility is that individuals may use rebound relationships as an approach to support fearlessness to demonstrate themselves or others that they are desirable. dating another person may give a way to take away interest from these negative feelings. Research proposes that individual breakups can reduce thought toward clarity, making them feel less sure of whom they are.(Slotter, Ga rdner, Finkel, 2010).Dating another individual may help to reaffirm ones thought toward oneself and give approval that one is photogenic and deserving of affection and consideration from others. Frazier and Cook (1993) found out that the main consideration in recovering from a relationship termination is confidence. Hence, if individuals might benefit that the relationship proves to be self-affirming to oneself they are more encouraged to try another relationship.Moreover, rebound relationship may be a way for filling a gap left by the previous partner, whether emotional or practical. Maner, DeWall, Baumeister, Schaller (2007) discovered that feelings of attachment can unconsciously change from an sr. relationship partner to another person when there is some take of similarity between two people (Brumbaugh Fraley, 2006). For other people, it may be more overt and helpful if the person found a partner to fill what is left behind by the previous partner. Therefore, for the purpose of vengeance, some individuals may enter into another relationship.People often elicits anger who experienced relationship termination (Sbarra Emery, 2005), and it could be frustrating when one did not admit the separation(Perilloux Buss, 2008).In expressing their fury, individuals may be interested by making vengeance or by striking back and making their partner feel avaricious through finding a new partner. They may be save motivated to show to their previous partner that they do not need to bother him or her, or to make it to the point that the previous partner is not essential anymore (Brumbaugh Fraley, 2014).Current StudyAs such, we know little about what kind of people are likely to be involved in rebound relationships or what functions these relationships might serve. Moreover, it is not obvious whether such relationships are necessarily misguided in the way they are portrayed in popular culture. In fact, studies of relationship scripts suggest it is normative to enter n ew relationships even prior to thedissolution of the old relationship (Richard, Datteri, Lord, 1998).Since there is very little research that touches on the pros and cons of rebound relationships or thevalidity of the claims typically made of them, the present study pull up stakes aim to know the stories of adults who are in the midst of rebound relationship. It aims to understand how they coped emotionallywith their previous relationship, how they describe their present relationship and howother people view their present relationship. The present study entrust also shed light to a deeper meaning of rebound relationship whether entering a new relationship, and the timing of doing so, provide be beneficialor unwholesome to ones new romantic relationship.The current study entrust aim to answer the question, What is the story behind rebound relationships of adults who are in the midst of it?It ordain answer the following specific questionsHow did you cope with your previous rela tionship?How do you describe your present relationship?How do people view your present relationship?MethodResearch DesignWe go away be using a report research on this study. We pull up stakes ask adults, who are in the midst of rebound relationship, to narrate their stories. We chose narrative research design, a qualitative research design, because according to Barrett and Stauffer (2009), narrative inquiry looks at individuals experiences and beliefs through the stories they tell. It also provides complementary knowledge in-depth description, understanding,and clarification of lived experience, with attention tospecifics and complexity (Polkinghorne, 2005). Narrative research design is also a crystalline lens into how humans understand their lives within particularcultures and time. The process of telling, recording, and interpretingpersonal life stories can be a poignant vehicle in understandinghow we create meaning of our being and is well-suited toresearch professional pra ctices (Hoshmand, 2005).ParticipantsThe participants of this study entrust be ten rebounders who are in the midst of rebound relationship for a span of three months and above. Participants essential be 21 40 years old. They shouldhave entered into a new relationship right after ending their previous relationship (at most, a month). Participants will be selected through a sweet sand verbena sampling method. According to Oliver (2006), snowball sampling is type of non-probability sampling in which the researcher starts by distinguishing an individual saw to be a proper respondent. This respondent is then asked to realise an alternate conceivable respondent. The process is repeated until the researcher has gathered fitted teaching. It is now and then called chain letter sampling. Snowball sampling might be a helpful strategy in research interested with conduct that is socially unsuitable.ProcedureIn this study, we will find a participant using a snowball sampling. We will find p articipants by asking our families and friends if they know someone who is in the midst of rebound relationship. After selecting possible participant, they will narrate their story about being in a rebound relationship.The selective information will be collected through an in-depth interview. The sources of data will come from the audiotapes and transcripts of the interviews. During the interview, there will be an interviewer, an beholder on participants behavior, note-taker who will take down notes of the important answers from the participants and a person who will record everything. After collecting the data, the transcripts and the notes during the interview will be encoded to the computer. There will be backup copies that will be stored in a separate location. To maintain confidentiality, in encoding transcripts and audio recordings, participants will be given a number. Also, audio recording will be destroyed after the study. info AnalysisAfter we gathered the information we w ill listen to the recorded audio a number of times. Next, we will transcribe the information and we will carefully read it numerous times. Then, we will summarize the gathered information. All of the content that will address the research questions will be intromitd. Also, the ideas and wordings of the participants will be rephrased at a minimum. We will chart and discuss the information from the narratives of the ten rebounders. Afterwards, we will come up with meanings and eventually, will lead us to stands that will answer our research questions.Data from ten adults in the midst of rebound relationship will be analyzed using thematic compendium thematic psychoanalysis is a method for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data. It minimally organizes and describes your data set in rich detail (Braun Clarke, 2006). With this, we will replicate Braun and Clarke (2006) method. This method will be using six phases 1.) familiarizing yourself with your data which includes taking notes or marking ideas for coding that we will then go back to in subsequent phases 2.) generating initial codes which includes production of initial codes from the data3.) searching for themes which re-focuses the analysis at the broader level of themes, rather than codes, includes sorting the different codes into potential themesand head start to examine codes, and consider how different codes may combine together to form an overarching theme4.) reviewing themes which includes two levels of reviewing and refining themes. Level one will include reviewing at the level of the coded data extracts. Level two will consider the validity of individual themes in relation to the data set, but also whether the candidate thematic mapaccurately reflects the meanings evident in the data set as a whole 5.) defining and naming theme we will then define and further refine the themes that we will present for our analysis, and analyses the data within them 6.) producing the r eport, this phase will start when we already have a set of completely worked-out themes, and we will include the final analysis and write-up of the report. After forming the themes, it is important that the analysis will give concise, coherent, logical, non-repetitive, and interesting neb of the story the data will tell within and across themes.