Scarlet Letter :: essays research papers

Controversy between bullion and Loveas shown in The Rocking-Horse Winner The Rocking-Horse Winner is couched in the symbols of the antediluvian myths. The start is poor, unsatisfied fairy princess who yearns for happiness Paul is the gallant knight on horse-back who rides to her rescue (Junkins 261). The mythical aspect of the floor is evident in the style and symbols. In the opening lines, the source seven expressions cook a fable-like quality reminiscent of any number of fairy princess tales, nonetheless the word advantages locates us in the atmosphere of the modern world, so does the word luck (Junkins 261). The r apiece of the symbolism is overwhelming, in several(prenominal) sense the story is about its literal, narrative level the life of the family that chooses money instead of some more stable value, takes money as its nexus of affection. The first fault lay with the mother (Snodgrass 117).There was a beautiful muliebrity who started with all the advantages, yet s he had no luck. She married for love, and the love turned to dust. She had comely children, yet she felt they had been thrust upon her, and she could not love them (Lawrence 1). The story continues to part us of Hester, who is unable to love her children and is obsessed with money. Only she herself knew that at the midsection of her heart was a hard little place that could not disembodied spirit love, no, not for anybody.(Lawrence 1) There were many problems in the household, one of which was a inadequacy of love from the mother. As Lawrence wrote Only she herself and her children themselves, knew it was not so. They read it in each others eyes (Lawrence 1). During a conversation, Pauls mother mentions that luck is, what causes you to have money. If youre lucky you have money. Thats why its better to be born lucky than rich. If youre rich you may loose your money. But if youre lucky you will ever get more Forbes 2money.(Lawrence 1). The situation is then made worsened by assu ming that her misfortunes were caused by her marriage to an unlucky husband. The father is understandably a failure as a provider and family-head, so overmuch that we are scarcely conscious of his existence. And his failure is aggravated by the laid-back social position the family tries to maintain (Koban 280). Lawrence tells us the mother had a depleted income, and the father had a small income, but not nearly enough for the social position which they had to keep up.