Evolution: Science and Religion Essay -- essays research papers fc

ontogenesis Science and ReligionIn 1895 Charles Darwin published a book describing his theory of evolution, and his theory of the natural selection process. This theory caused much uproar in the religious community because Darwins theory went against the story of creation envisioned in the Holy Bible. His theory claimed that totally life currently in place had evolved and adapted from a single organism in the beginning. oer time and by process of natural selection only the predominant species were left over while the other, less dominant species, went extinct. His theory, backed by scientific analysis, had dismissed the idea of a single deity creating all life on Earth. It is not like Darwin had a personal agenda against religion or any(prenominal)thing, moreover he did create what would become the chief(prenominal) evidence used by atheists to disprove the Bible. Now his theory is passive theory, and is yet to be proven as a fact, but is however believed by much of the sc ientific society as a fact. The peel between the religious and the atheistic will rage for many years, but where the battle will cause the most damage is in the American teach system. The thesis of this paper is, trainers moldiness be required to teach evolution which is already in place in the American school system, but teachers cannot be allowed to teach evolution as a fact, or evidence disproving the existence of a god. On top of all of that, they must as well allow the expression of opposing viewpoints.In the American school system there is a constant separation of church and State. This separation is undisputedly good for keeping the civil rights of students in order. By not allowing the pressures of church in schools, people of reason cannot abuse their power for religious preferences. Richard W. Garnett wrote in an article, the separation of church and state is crucial to any attractive vision of religious freedom (Garnett). Teaching children unproven imprint as a fact is just as bad as the forcing of religious beliefs on a student. In the end teachers must run across the importance of teaching evolutionary theories as theory only, and never as actual fact.The clash of creationism and evolution has begun once again. On one brass sits the Christians and believers of the Holy Bible as a literal piece of write up on the other side sits scientists who dismantle any belief in any sort of God. The... ...whether you believe in a deity, or none at all it will require some faith on your part (Johnson).Works CitedBehe, Michael J. The Concept of Gradual Evolution is Flawed. Creationism vs. Evolution. Ed. By Bruno J. Leone. San Diego, CA Greenhaven Press, 2002 22.Branch, Glenn. Creationists and the Grand Canyon. Humanist Mar./April 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004 Garnett, Richard W. Keep it to Yourself. Commonweal Aug. 13 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004 Johnson, Matt. Personal Intervie w. 18 Jan. 2005Klyce, Brig. Evolution versus Creationism. Panspermia. 14 Oct. 2004 Moore, Randy and Jay encompass and Murray Jensen. Twenty Questions What Have the Courts Said about the Teaching of Evolution and Creationism in Public Schools? Bioscience August 2003 EBSCOhost, Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 29 September 2004 Sheler, Jeffrey. The Pope and Darwin. U.S. News and World Report 4 October 1996 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 29 September 2004 Wells, Jonathan. rugged Icons of Evolution. Natural History April 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004