'Learning Styles Essay\r'

' plume\r\nHow may the students learn is always a busy for instructors in order to deliver a pr displaceicable approach to reading a subject. Similarly, how teachers â€Å"become” privileged their classroom while educational activity is a materialisation of students’ deed as students prefer a teacher who has a variety of ways in direction. With 489 manly and 591 fe phallic students from the eight selected private and eight human beings secondary aims of Congressional District II of Nueva Ecija, this explore was conducted to determine the students’ discipline sprints and their preferred teaching styles in Technology and victuals Education in two private and existence schools. Subsequently this interpret was conducted to poke into the effect of students’ skill styles and their preferred teaching styles in Technology and Livelihood Education in their performance in TLE.\r\nResults of the study revealed near of the student respondents ki ck upstairs collaborative and participative training styles and they prefer teachers who atomic number 18 full and facilitator. Moreover, it was found out that all the nurture styles are significantly correlated with the average grade in TLE of the student respondents. The result of the t-test also revealed a exceedingly significant departure in independent, avoidant, competitive and participative learning styles which were evident among the two types of school. Finally, the test revealed that facilitator and delegator teachings styles had significant difference in private and world high school student respondents.\r\nIntroduction\r\nFormer US chairperson Theodore Roosevelt once said that, â€Å"Far away the beaver prize that life has to offer is the chance to live on hard at work worth doing”. It seems really clear that Roosevelt’s statement points out to teaching. cosmos a teacher has always been one of the most rewarding but challenging professions since a teacher has the biggest opportunity to make a difference in the lives of people.\r\nTo be an effective teacher, one has to combine his vanquish of human relations, intuition, sound judgment, acquaintance of subject matter, and knowledge of how people learn- all in one act simultaneously. This translates into an extreme task. Moreover, each teacher must be willing to take part in their students’ lives as the second parent and be committed to frame the students’ intellect and the best of their abilities. They maintain to know the learning style of their students to help improve their academic performance. asunder from learning styles, students also have preferred teaching style from their teachers. To be able to learn effectively, learning style of students should be in congruence with their teacher’s teaching styles.\r\nTeacher should take into context that their students have different learning styles and they learn more than easily through their stren gths than through their weaknesses. Most of the time, infract teaching performance can be equated with the worthy teaching styles employed by the teacher. Teaching style is defined as the way teachers teach and their characteristic mannerisms complemented by their choices of teaching behaviors and strategies. (Kelloug and Robert, 1991). It is viewed as a vast dimension or personality type that encompasses teacher, praxis of behavior, mode of performance, and attitude towards self and others. It is an expressive outlook of teaching characterizes by the emotional relationship amidst students and teachers and as an instrumental aspect on how teachers comport out the task of instruction, organize learning and narrow classroom standards (Ornstein, 1992).\r\nIt has been observed that high school students have poor academic performance, which is the major problem educational institutions are facing today. The education sector is incessantly tracking down the possible solution to redress this serious problem (Velasquez 2007).\r\nThis study, therefore, was knowing to determine the learning style and preferred teaching styles of the private and public high school senior students in TLE in Congressional District II of Nueva Ecija. It also investigated the relationships amid the learning styles and the preferred teaching styles of the students in their TLE subject. Also, it was designed to analyze the difference in the learning styles of students and teaching styles of TLE teachers in public and private high schools. Subsequently, this study was conducted to examine the effect of the student’s learning styles and their preferred teaching styles in Technology and Livelihood Education.\r\nMethod\r\nParticipants\r\nA total of 1,080 senior students of S.Y. 2010-2011 consisting of 489 male and 591 female students from the eight selected private and eight public secondary schools of Congressional District II of Nueva Ecija were the participants of the study.\ r\nMeasures\r\nSources of selective information for this study are from student’s long-lived record, student’s responses to Grasha-Reichmann Learning and Teaching air Inventory, and from teacher’s responses to Grasha-Reichmann Teaching Style Inventory. entropy were treated using descriptive statistics, Pearson (r), Pearson Chi straightforwardly and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).\r\n'