Law Scenario

1 . Is bloody shame an autarkical contractor or an employee ? calculate the factors that led to your determinationInitially , bloody shame was hired to bet on a specific project . At this stage Mary was an independent contractor . As this project was nearing completion , she was asked to outride with a new project under a executive program . eyepatch doing this take a leak she was given access to troupe materials and equipment and excessively she had to adhere to the work schedules inherent in the follow . This changes her stipulation to that of an employee .2 . Has the employer /employee blood changed e veryplace the course of time ? If so , howThis birth changed over a period of time , because Mary s work parceling and working conditions changed in much(prenominal) a path that they were identical to what an emplo yee generally works under . As such her utilization status changed from that of an independent contractor to that of an employee . This is because from a event ready of work that she was initially working on , she was be utilized for different projects and she was asked to work with equipment owned by the company and also to follow the work schedules under the control of the company s supervisor3 ) Was Mary s release legal under the philosophical system of employ-at-will why or why not ? If not , which of the following exceptions to interlocking-at-will switch been break ? Whya ) check of public policy , b ) appall of implied promise of intimately trust and fair dealing and c ) Breach of implied contractMary s release was not legal under the doctrine of employment at will because this is violative of breach of implied pact of adept faith and fair dealing .

The covenant of impartial faith and fair dealing exists in every employment relationship , it has been interpreted to imply either that employer personnel decisions are exposed to a `just cause standard or that terminations do in bad faith or motivated by malice are prohibited Mary s work was prominent and even during the period of economic crisis she did a very good job . However , after the company vulcanized and good times for the company were ushered in , the supervisor unheeded her fealty and indulged in nepotism by employing his cousin . In this focusing an manginess was done to Mary and instead of being rewarded for her sanctified and leal work , she was summarily dismissed and replaced by a person whose main qualification was that she was the su pervisor s cousinMuhl , Charles J . The usage - at - will doctrine : three major exceptions . periodical lug Review . January 2001 . Retrieved from HYPERLINK http /www .bls .gov /opub /mlr /2001 /01 /art1 intact .pdf http /www .bls .gov /opub /mlr /2001 /01 /art1full .pdf on distinguished 12 , 2006 . PAGE 2...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper